What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.
Click to find out more (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters away. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more vulnerable to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
safe distance from cell tower is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.