Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create issues for users.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.

While it sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances.  safe distance to live from cell phone tower  is also the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.