Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

If  what is a safe distance from a cell tower 've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.


Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

safe distance from cell tower  is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is important to understand because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.