Very best safest distance from a 5G cell System?
If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. https://mcguire-david-3.blogbright.net/are-usually-minimum-acceptable-mileage-between-yourself-and-a-5g-mobile-system-1682567097 look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
Although what is a safe distance from a cell tower may sound like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. safe distance to live from cell phone tower can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.