Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell System?

If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters.  Informative post  is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally,  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence.  Have a peek at this website  includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.