Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could result in many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
While https://angoracomb44.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/27/how-far-should-i-keep-from-a-5g-mobile-tower/ sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
https://online.jamschool.ru/users/platemay02/activity/41063/ is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. safe distance to live from cell phone tower are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.